NYSX vs. TDVG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

NYSX (Global X NYSE 100 ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. NYSX is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NYSX charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

NYSX vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NYSX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.96%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.16%
• 6M: 8.49%
• YTD: 10.73%
• 1Y: 17.92%
• 3Y*: 15.66%
• 5Y*: 10.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYSX vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	31.20%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	11.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NYSX and TDVG is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2026	0.47

Return for Risk

NYSX vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NYSX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 67
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NYSX vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NYSE 100 ETF (NYSX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NYSX	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.79	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.57	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.40	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.88	—

Drawdowns

NYSX vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYSX drawdown since its inception was -8.78%, smaller than the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYSX and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NYSX	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-19.20%	+10.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.24%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-0.06%	-3.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.07%	-3.70%	+1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.75%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NYSX	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.43%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.97%	9.71%	+17.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.97%	13.90%	+13.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.97%	13.85%	+13.12%

NYSX vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NYSX vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

NYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than TDVG's 0.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NYSX Global X NYSE 100 ETF	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.97%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NYSX and TDVG in my portfolio?

NYSX and TDVG have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NYSX or TDVG?

On fees, NYSX is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NYSX or TDVG?

NYSX is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NYSX or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.05% for NYSX.

What is the main difference between NYSX and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NYSX and 0.50% for TDVG.