NXTG vs. ASMH
NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) and ASMH (ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - NXTG tracks the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index while ASMH tracks the ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NXTG returned 82.82% vs 130.11% for ASMH. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXTG charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ASMH.
Performance
NXTG vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 54.54% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 63.99% return.
NXTG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 22.84%
- YTD
- 54.54%
- 6M
- 55.39%
- 1Y
- 82.82%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
ASMH
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 25.24%
- YTD
- 63.99%
- 6M
- 53.18%
- 1Y
- 130.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 54.54% | 30.58% |
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 63.99% | 58.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXTG and ASMH is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2025 | 0.61 |
The correlation between NXTG and ASMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXTG vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank
NXTG
ASMH
NXTG vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.52 | 3.36 | +1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.69 | 3.81 | +1.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.47 | +0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.10 | 8.24 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.73 | 21.26 | +10.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52 | 3.36 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 3.59 | -2.90 |
Drawdowns
NXTG vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and ASMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -15.89% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.28% | -15.89% | +5.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.87% | -4.33% | -3.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 6.14% | -3.52% |
Volatility
NXTG vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) is 8.27%, while ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH) has a volatility of 13.84%. This indicates that NXTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXTG | ASMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.27% | 13.84% | -5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 30.43% | -15.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.44% | 38.94% | -20.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.93% | 38.32% | -20.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 38.32% | -19.44% |
NXTG vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXTG vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison
NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, more than ASMH's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASMH ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF | 0.99% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXTG and ASMH have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASMH has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to NXTG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs ASMH's -15.89%.
On 1-year performance, ASMH leads with 130.11% vs 82.82% for NXTG. On fees, ASMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NXTG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ASMH has performed better with a 130.11% return vs 82.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ASMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.99% for ASMH.
NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while ASMH tracks ASML Holding NV Sponsored ADR. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Precidian Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.19% for ASMH.
NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXTG and ASMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer