PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG vs. ASMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NXTG vs. ASMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NXTG vs. ASMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
4.07%30.58%
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
25.77%58.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 4.07% return, which is significantly lower than ASMH's 25.77% return.


NXTG

1D
3.45%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
4.07%
6M
8.80%
1Y
34.24%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.63%

ASMH

1D
4.15%
1M
-6.47%
YTD
25.77%
6M
39.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NXTG vs. ASMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMH's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NXTG vs. ASMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG vs. ASMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF (ASMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTGASMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.59

NXTG vs. ASMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTGASMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

3.00

-2.45

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and ASMH is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NXTG vs. ASMH - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than ASMH's 1.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.64%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%
ASMH
ASML Holding NV ADR Hedged ETF
1.29%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. ASMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than ASMH's maximum drawdown of -15.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and ASMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTGASMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-15.89%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-11.21%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.96%

-4.43%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

Volatility

NXTG vs. ASMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NXTGASMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.87%

36.81%

-16.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

36.81%

-19.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.65%

36.81%

-18.16%