NXTE vs. THMZ
NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and THMZ (Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NXTE returned 64.20% vs 15.10% for THMZ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for THMZ.
Performance
NXTE vs. THMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 36.11% return, which is significantly higher than THMZ's 3.26% return.
NXTE
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 17.52%
- YTD
- 36.11%
- 6M
- 34.91%
- 1Y
- 64.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THMZ
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- 15.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTE vs. THMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 36.11% | 44.83% |
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 3.26% | 31.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXTE and THMZ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.82 |
The correlation between NXTE and THMZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXTE vs. THMZ — Risk / Return Rank
NXTE
THMZ
NXTE vs. THMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXTE | THMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 0.97 | +1.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.45 | 1.45 | +1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.17 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.72 | 0.95 | +3.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.12 | 3.41 | +11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXTE | THMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 0.97 | +1.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.64 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
NXTE vs. THMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than THMZ's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and THMZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXTE | THMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.64% | -15.99% | -12.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.68% | -15.99% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.68% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.88% | -2.60% | -5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 4.43% | -0.17% |
Volatility
NXTE vs. THMZ - Volatility Comparison
Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) at 4.23%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXTE | THMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.27% | 4.23% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 12.53% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 15.58% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 18.72% | +7.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 18.72% | +7.27% |
NXTE vs. THMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than THMZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NXTE vs. THMZ - Dividend Comparison
NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than THMZ's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.13% |
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF | 0.41% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXTE and THMZ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTE has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to THMZ (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs THMZ's -15.99%.
On 1-year performance, NXTE leads with 64.20% vs 15.10% for THMZ. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 64.20% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.
THMZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.41%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.
They also come from different issuers: AXS and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.50% for THMZ.
NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXTE and THMZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer