PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. THMZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. THMZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly higher than THMZ's 7.23% return.


NXTE

1D
4.31%
1M
-7.16%
6M
12.96%
YTD
22.67%
1Y
38.44%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.33%

THMZ

1D
1.97%
1M
3.63%
6M
10.58%
YTD
7.23%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
29.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$193.74K$136.30K$197.70K
$78.38K$60.05K$62.28K

NXTE vs. THMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
22.67%44.41%
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
7.23%31.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and THMZ is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.80

The correlation between NXTE and THMZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. THMZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

THMZ
THMZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
THMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
THMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTE vs. THMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTETHMZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.16

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

0.92

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

3.25

+3.33

NXTE vs. THMZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the THMZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and THMZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. THMZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than THMZ's maximum drawdown of -15.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and THMZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTETHMZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-15.99%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.50%

-15.99%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.37%

0.00%

-13.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

-2.52%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

4.50%

+1.36%

Volatility

NXTE vs. THMZ - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) at 5.26%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTETHMZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

5.26%

+6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

14.26%

+12.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.51%

17.09%

+13.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.24%

18.98%

+8.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

18.98%

+8.26%

NXTE vs. THMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than THMZ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. THMZ - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than THMZ's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.54%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
THMZ
Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
0.23%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and THMZ have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to THMZ (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs THMZ's -15.99%.

On 1-year performance, NXTE leads with 38.44% vs 14.61% for THMZ. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 38.44% return vs 14.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.23% for THMZ.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.50% for THMZ.

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and THMZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer