THMZ vs. LENS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

THMZ (Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF) and LENS (Sarmaya Thematic ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, THMZ returned 15.10% vs 61.82% for LENS. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THMZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LENS.

Performance

THMZ vs. LENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THMZ achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than LENS's 13.33% return.

THMZ

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: 4.63%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 6M: 3.17%
• 1Y: 15.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LENS

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 18.33%
• 1Y: 61.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THMZ vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF	3.26%	31.76%
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	13.33%	61.46%

Correlation

The correlation between THMZ and LENS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

THMZ vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THMZ

THMZ Risk / Return Rank: 26
THMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
THMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
THMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 27
THMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
THMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LENS

LENS Risk / Return Rank: 67
LENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
LENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
LENS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LENS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THMZ vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THMZ	LENS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.34	-1.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.70	-1.25
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.41	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	4.02	-3.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	10.02	-6.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THMZ vs. LENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THMZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the LENS Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THMZ and LENS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THMZ	LENS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	2.34	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.64	2.09	-0.45

Drawdowns

THMZ vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THMZ drawdown since its inception was -15.99%, roughly equal to the maximum LENS drawdown of -15.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THMZ and LENS.

Drawdown Indicators

	THMZ	LENS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-15.47%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.99%	-15.47%	-0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-13.64%	+12.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-3.71%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	6.19%	-1.76%

Volatility

THMZ vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF (THMZ) is 4.23%, while Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that THMZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THMZ	LENS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.23%	6.16%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.53%	22.07%	-9.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.58%	26.54%	-10.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	25.49%	-6.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	25.49%	-6.77%

THMZ vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison

THMZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

THMZ vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison

THMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than LENS's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	1.41%	1.60%
THMZ Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF	0.41%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THMZ and LENS in my portfolio?

THMZ and LENS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THMZ or LENS?

LENS has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to THMZ (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THMZ dropped -15.99% vs LENS's -15.47%.

Which ETF is better, THMZ or LENS?

On 1-year performance, LENS leads with 61.82% vs 15.10% for THMZ. On fees, THMZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, THMZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THMZ or LENS?

Over the 1-year period, LENS has performed better with a 61.82% return vs 15.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THMZ or LENS?

THMZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LENS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THMZ or LENS?

LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.41% for THMZ.

What is the main difference between THMZ and LENS?

They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for THMZ and 0.79% for LENS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LENS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.