PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. RINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NXTE

1D
2.11%
1M
18.44%
YTD
36.97%
6M
36.75%
1Y
67.30%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10Y*

RINC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
36.97%21.84%-3.42%9.80%
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
0.00%7.75%-5.74%1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and RINC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between NXTE and RINC has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

NXTE vs. RINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTE
RINC

Technology

48.5%

-

Industrials

17.6%

-

Healthcare

11.3%

-

Real Estate

10.9%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%

-

Utilities

2.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Communication Services

1.9%

-

Financial Services

1.5%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%

-

Energy

-

-

Technology

NXTE
48.5%
RINC

-

Industrials

NXTE
17.6%
RINC

-

Healthcare

NXTE
11.3%
RINC

-

Real Estate

NXTE
10.9%
RINC
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

NXTE
4.1%
RINC

-

Utilities

NXTE
2.2%
RINC

-

Consumer Defensive

NXTE
2.1%
RINC

-

Communication Services

NXTE
1.9%
RINC

-

Financial Services

NXTE
1.5%
RINC

-

Basic Materials

NXTE
0.5%
RINC

-

Energy

NXTE

-

RINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

RINC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTERINCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.09

NXTE vs. RINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTERINCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. RINC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTERINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

Volatility

NXTE vs. RINC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTERINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.00%

NXTE vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RINC's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
RINC
AXS Real Estate Income ETF
2.16%6.04%10.85%3.88%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and RINC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RINC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RINC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

RINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while RINC is REIT. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.89% for RINC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and RINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer