RINC vs. SARK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index, while SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. RINC is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.39, they often move in opposite directions. RINC charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.

Performance

RINC vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SARK

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: -6.78%
• 6M: -2.33%
• 1Y: -33.81%
• 3Y*: -30.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINC vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.74%	1.71%
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF	-6.78%	-25.93%	-36.90%	-23.63%

Correlation

The correlation between RINC and SARK is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2023	-0.39

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between RINC and SARK has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.39 to -0.06, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Return for Risk

RINC vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SARK

SARK Risk / Return Rank: 2
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINC vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RINC	SARK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.95	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.24	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	RINC	SARK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.07%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-40.75%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-74.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-79.42%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-46.46%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	30.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RINC	SARK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	35.91%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	56.24%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	56.24%	—

RINC vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINC has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINC vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

RINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than SARK's 3.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%	0.00%
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF	3.02%	2.82%	15.49%	12.57%	25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINC and SARK in my portfolio?

RINC and SARK have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RINC or SARK?

On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINC or SARK?

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for RINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINC or SARK?

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.02%, compared with 2.16% for RINC.

What is the main difference between RINC and SARK?

RINC is categorized as REIT, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for RINC and 0.75% for SARK.