PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. CLIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. CLIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly higher than CLIP's 2.13% return.


NXTE

1D
4.31%
1M
-7.16%
6M
12.96%
YTD
22.67%
1Y
38.44%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.33%

CLIP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.82%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.03M$27.37M$36.44M
$193.74K$136.30K$197.70K

NXTE vs. CLIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
22.67%21.84%-3.42%3.57%
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
2.13%4.23%5.26%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and CLIP is -0.15, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023

-0.03

The correlation between NXTE and CLIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.02 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. CLIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CLIP
CLIP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTE vs. CLIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTECLIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-16.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-103.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

35.46

-34.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

194.13

-192.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

1,642.72

-1,636.14

NXTE vs. CLIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the CLIP Sharpe Ratio of 18.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and CLIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. CLIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than CLIP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and CLIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTECLIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-0.08%

-28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.50%

-0.02%

-21.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

-0.08%

-27.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.37%

0.00%

-13.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.92%

0.00%

-7.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.86%

0.00%

+5.86%

Volatility

NXTE vs. CLIP - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CLIP) at 0.06%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTECLIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

0.06%

+11.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.27%

0.15%

+26.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.51%

0.21%

+30.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.24%

0.43%

+26.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.24%

0.43%

+26.81%

NXTE vs. CLIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than CLIP's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. CLIP - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than CLIP's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLIP
Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF
3.81%4.14%5.11%2.75%0.00%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.54%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and CLIP have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to CLIP (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs CLIP's -0.08%.

On 3-year performance, NXTE leads with 14.45% vs 4.61% for CLIP. On fees, CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, CLIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 14.45% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

CLIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.54% for NXTE.

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while CLIP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.07% for CLIP.

CLIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.07 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and CLIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer