NXTE vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both Global Equities funds. NXTE is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTE returned 18.63%/yr vs 21.15%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

NXTE vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 36.11% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return.

NXTE

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 17.52%
• YTD: 36.11%
• 6M: 34.91%
• 1Y: 64.20%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 5.28%
• YTD: 12.13%
• 6M: 12.96%
• 1Y: 29.18%
• 3Y*: 21.15%
• 5Y*: 11.28%
• 10Y*: 12.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	36.11%	21.84%	-3.42%	13.85%	-1.33%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.13%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	8.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and ACWI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022	0.85

The correlation between NXTE and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

NXTE vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXTE	ACWI
Technology	48.5%	29.4%
Industrials	17.6%	10.9%
Healthcare	11.3%	8.1%
Real Estate	10.9%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	4.1%	9.3%
Utilities	2.2%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	5.0%
Communication Services	1.9%	9.0%
Financial Services	1.5%	16.1%
Basic Materials	0.5%	3.7%
Energy	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

NXTE vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 79
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NXTE	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.29	+0.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.17	+0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	3.01	+1.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.12	13.53	+1.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NXTE vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NXTE	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.29	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.75	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.43	+0.24

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTE	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-56.00%	+27.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-9.73%	-3.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.24%	-16.55%	-10.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.83%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.88%	-8.61%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	2.16%	+2.10%

Volatility

NXTE vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.93%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTE	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	3.93%	+5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	10.29%	+9.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	12.78%	+11.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.99%	16.05%	+9.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.99%	17.11%	+8.88%

NXTE vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTE vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTE and ACWI in my portfolio?

NXTE and ACWI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTE or ACWI?

NXTE has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, NXTE or ACWI?

On 3-year performance, ACWI leads with 21.15% vs 18.63% for NXTE. On fees, ACWI is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTE or ACWI?

Over the 3-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 21.15% return vs 18.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTE or ACWI?

ACWI is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTE or ACWI?

ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

What is the main difference between NXTE and ACWI?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.