ACWI vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
ACWI and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ACWI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World Index. It was launched on Mar 26, 2008. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both ACWI and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ACWI or VOO.
Performance
ACWI vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACWI achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 25.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ACWI has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 9.24%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.
ACWI
18.47%
-0.42%
7.92%
25.00%
11.21%
9.24%
VOO
25.52%
1.19%
12.21%
32.23%
15.58%
13.15%
Key characteristics
ACWI | VOO | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.14 | 2.62 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.94 | 3.50 |
Omega Ratio | 1.38 | 1.49 |
Calmar Ratio | 3.05 | 3.78 |
Martin Ratio | 13.63 | 17.12 |
Ulcer Index | 1.81% | 1.86% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.55% | 12.19% |
Max Drawdown | -56.00% | -33.99% |
Current Drawdown | -1.69% | -1.36% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ACWI vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACWI has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ACWI and VOO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ACWI vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ACWI vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than VOO's 1.25% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.59% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.25% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% | 2.26% | 1.89% |
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.25% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
ACWI vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACWI drawdown since its inception was -56.00%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACWI and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ACWI vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) is 3.22%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that ACWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.