NXG vs. UTF
NXG (NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund) is Global Equity Income fund actively managed by NXG, while UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, NXG returned 35.01%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for UTF. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NXG vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXG achieves a 24.20% return, which is significantly higher than UTF's 14.60% return.
NXG
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 24.20%
- 6M
- 24.75%
- 1Y
- 39.68%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UTF
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 16.03%
- 1Y
- 11.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.56%
NXG vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 24.20% | 25.98% | 51.16% | 4.54% | -5.68% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 14.60% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | 1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXG and UTF is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2022 | 0.37 |
The correlation between NXG and UTF shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXG vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
NXG
UTF
NXG vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXG | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.16 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 1.10 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | 2.25 | +6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXG | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 0.92 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.45 | +0.55 |
Drawdowns
NXG vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXG drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXG and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXG | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -72.62% | +46.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -10.33% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.14% | -21.06% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.69% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -10.37% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 5.05% | -0.27% |
Volatility
NXG vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.78%. This indicates that NXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXG | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 2.78% | +3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 8.39% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 12.33% | +6.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 18.33% | +8.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.88% | 23.37% | +3.51% |
Dividends
NXG vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
NXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than UTF's 6.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 10.86% | 12.83% | 14.15% | 12.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.98% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXG and UTF have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXG has higher volatility (6.13%) compared to UTF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXG dropped -26.14% vs UTF's -72.62%.
NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NXG and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer