NXG vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
NXG is an actively managed fund by NXG. It was launched on Sep 28, 2012. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
NXG vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NXG vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.11% | 28.75% | 51.16% | 4.54% | -5.68% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 16.71% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | -3.14% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXG achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 16.71% return.
NXG
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 11.11%
- 6M
- 18.12%
- 1Y
- 35.48%
- 3Y*
- 32.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMO
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 14.50%
- 3Y*
- 33.42%
- 5Y*
- 32.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NXG vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXG has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NXG vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
NXG
EMO
NXG vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NXG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.67 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.00 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.15 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.81 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.98 | 2.44 | +3.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NXG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.67 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.11 | +0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between NXG and EMO is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
NXG vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
NXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.82%, more than EMO's 8.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.82% | 12.67% | 14.15% | 12.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.40% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
NXG vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXG drawdown since its inception was -26.14%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXG and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.14% | -95.06% | +68.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.94% | -18.81% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | -5.90% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -32.26% | +25.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.81% | 6.23% | -0.42% |
Volatility
NXG vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 5.53%. This indicates that NXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NXG | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 5.53% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 11.68% | +0.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.72% | 21.67% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 26.82% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 41.42% | -14.52% |