PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWPX vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NWPX vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWPX achieves a 91.55% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 101.03% return. Over the past 10 years, NWPX has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 28.73%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 47.12% annualized return.


NWPX

1D
-0.02%
1M
12.25%
YTD
91.55%
6M
101.41%
1Y
200.38%
3Y*
61.93%
5Y*
30.35%
10Y*
28.73%

LRCX

1D
2.78%
1M
32.93%
YTD
101.03%
6M
115.41%
1Y
313.85%
3Y*
79.31%
5Y*
40.79%
10Y*
47.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWPX vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWPX
Northwest Pipe Company
91.55%29.49%59.48%-10.21%5.97%12.37%-15.04%43.02%21.68%11.15%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
101.03%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-24.40%76.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NWPX and LRCX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1995

0.21

Over the past year, NWPX and LRCX have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NWPX:

$1.17B

LRCX:

$434.03B

EPS

NWPX:

$4.25

LRCX:

$5.29

PE Ratio

NWPX:

28.17

LRCX:

65.00

PEG Ratio

NWPX:

0.55

LRCX:

4.92

PS Ratio

NWPX:

2.16

LRCX:

20.11

PB Ratio

NWPX:

2.90

LRCX:

41.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWPX:

$548.14M

LRCX:

$21.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWPX:

$110.94M

LRCX:

$10.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

NWPX:

$75.93M

LRCX:

$6.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWPX vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWPX
NWPX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWPX vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWPXLRCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

5.08

6.34

-1.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.10

5.04

+1.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.67

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

12.85

15.81

-2.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

42.75

53.72

-10.97

NWPX vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWPX Sharpe Ratio is 5.08, which is comparable to the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 6.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWPX and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWPXLRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.08

6.34

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.89

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.06

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.44

-0.25

Drawdowns

NWPX vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWPX drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWPX and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWPXLRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.71%

-87.90%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.70%

-20.01%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.36%

-47.10%

+11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.71%

-56.39%

+20.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.50%

-56.39%

+9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

0.00%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.40%

-28.19%

-15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

5.87%

-1.16%

Volatility

NWPX vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) is 10.42%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that NWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWPXLRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.42%

16.14%

-5.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.22%

40.20%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.79%

49.88%

-10.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

45.94%

-9.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.05%

44.58%

-3.53%

Dividends

NWPX vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

NWPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.29%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
NWPX
Northwest Pipe Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NWPX vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Pipe Company and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
138.25M
5.84B
(NWPX) Total Revenue
(LRCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWPX vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northwest Pipe Company and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
19.3%
49.8%
Portfolio components
NWPX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a gross profit of 26.67M and revenue of 138.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.3%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

NWPX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported an operating income of 12.66M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

NWPX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Northwest Pipe Company reported a net income of 10.53M and revenue of 138.25M, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NWPX and LRCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRCX has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to NWPX (10.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWPX dropped -87.71% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.34 vs 5.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWPX and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer