PortfoliosLab logo
NWPX vs. FLR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NWPX and FLR is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NWPX vs. FLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NWPX:

0.27

FLR:

-0.04

Sortino Ratio

NWPX:

0.72

FLR:

0.27

Omega Ratio

NWPX:

1.08

FLR:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

NWPX:

0.23

FLR:

-0.02

Martin Ratio

NWPX:

0.67

FLR:

-0.07

Ulcer Index

NWPX:

16.34%

FLR:

21.88%

Daily Std Dev

NWPX:

35.51%

FLR:

45.11%

Max Drawdown

NWPX:

-87.71%

FLR:

-95.89%

Current Drawdown

NWPX:

-38.67%

FLR:

-49.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NWPX:

$388.90M

FLR:

$6.99B

EPS

NWPX:

$3.27

FLR:

$10.47

PE Ratio

NWPX:

12.04

FLR:

4.03

PEG Ratio

NWPX:

2.61

FLR:

0.31

PS Ratio

NWPX:

0.78

FLR:

0.42

PB Ratio

NWPX:

1.03

FLR:

1.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NWPX:

$495.44M

FLR:

$16.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NWPX:

$94.63M

FLR:

$614.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

NWPX:

$55.01M

FLR:

$607.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWPX achieves a -19.93% return, which is significantly lower than FLR's -15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, NWPX has outperformed FLR with an annualized return of 6.20%, while FLR has yielded a comparatively lower -2.13% annualized return.


NWPX

YTD

-19.93%

1M

-8.78%

6M

-31.08%

1Y

9.43%

3Y*

4.97%

5Y*

9.02%

10Y*

6.20%

FLR

YTD

-15.69%

1M

19.17%

6M

-25.92%

1Y

-1.59%

3Y*

13.78%

5Y*

29.07%

10Y*

-2.13%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Northwest Pipe Company

Fluor Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NWPX vs. FLR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NWPX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NWPX is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NWPX is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NWPX is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NWPX is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NWPX is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FLR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FLR is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FLR is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FLR is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FLR is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FLR is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FLR is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NWPX vs. FLR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) and Fluor Corporation (FLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NWPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the FLR Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWPX and FLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NWPX vs. FLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NWPX nor FLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NWPX
Northwest Pipe Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLR
Fluor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.63%3.87%2.61%1.63%1.60%1.78%1.39%

Drawdowns

NWPX vs. FLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWPX drawdown since its inception was -87.71%, smaller than the maximum FLR drawdown of -95.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWPX and FLR.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NWPX vs. FLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northwest Pipe Company (NWPX) is 10.60%, while Fluor Corporation (FLR) has a volatility of 13.58%. This indicates that NWPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NWPX vs. FLR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Northwest Pipe Company and Fluor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
116.12M
3.98B
(NWPX) Total Revenue
(FLR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NWPX vs. FLR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Northwest Pipe Company and Fluor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
16.7%
3.5%
(NWPX) Gross Margin
(FLR) Gross Margin
NWPX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northwest Pipe Company reported a gross profit of 19.37M and revenue of 116.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.7%.

FLR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

NWPX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northwest Pipe Company reported an operating income of 5.57M and revenue of 116.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

FLR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported an operating income of 91.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.3%.

NWPX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Northwest Pipe Company reported a net income of 3.96M and revenue of 116.12M, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

FLR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Fluor Corporation reported a net income of -241.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in a net margin of -6.1%.