PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWJJX vs. GRISX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWJJX achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than GRISX's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, NWJJX has underperformed GRISX with an annualized return of 1.61%, while GRISX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.


NWJJX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.48%
1Y
4.57%
3Y*
3.99%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
1.61%

GRISX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.08%
YTD
11.19%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.79%
3Y*
22.03%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
15.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWJJX
Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund
0.24%6.71%1.86%5.28%-13.82%-1.55%8.26%9.58%-0.67%3.14%
GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
11.19%17.41%24.13%25.55%-18.49%28.32%17.92%30.94%-3.84%21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between NWJJX and GRISX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

-0.06

The correlation between NWJJX and GRISX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWJJX vs. GRISX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWJJX
NWJJX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NWJJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWJJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWJJX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
NWJJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWJJX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

GRISX
GRISX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
GRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWJJXGRISXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.43

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.16

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

14.74

-10.38

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWJJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the GRISX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWJJX and GRISX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWJJXGRISXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.38

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.80

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.84

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.43

+0.04

Drawdowns

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWJJX drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, smaller than the maximum GRISX drawdown of -55.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWJJX and GRISX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWJJXGRISXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

-55.53%

+36.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.94%

-8.95%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

-18.78%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.78%

-24.75%

+5.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.99%

-33.85%

+14.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-0.32%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-10.85%

+6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.91%

-0.91%

Volatility

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) is 1.31%, while Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that NWJJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWJJXGRISXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

2.87%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

9.00%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

11.90%

-7.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

16.94%

-11.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

18.08%

-13.22%

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWJJX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GRISX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWJJX vs. GRISX - Dividend Comparison

NWJJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than GRISX's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
4.60%5.08%2.62%0.79%1.67%4.96%1.27%6.26%18.54%6.66%7.42%11.98%
NWJJX
Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund
4.19%4.14%4.10%3.09%1.89%2.18%5.17%3.30%2.60%2.16%3.12%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWJJX and GRISX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRISX has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to NWJJX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWJJX dropped -18.99% vs GRISX's -55.53%.

GRISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWJJX and GRISX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer