NWJJX vs. FGBCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX).
NWJJX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Feb 15, 1984. FGBCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002.
Performance
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | -0.39% | 6.71% | 1.86% | 5.28% | -13.82% | -1.55% | 8.26% | 9.58% | -0.67% | 3.14% |
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C | -0.40% | 6.08% | 0.04% | 5.09% | -14.63% | -1.98% | 8.73% | 8.49% | -1.43% | 2.68% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NWJJX having a -0.39% return and FGBCX slightly lower at -0.40%. Over the past 10 years, NWJJX has outperformed FGBCX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while FGBCX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.18% annualized return.
NWJJX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
FGBCX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.56%
- 5Y*
- -0.83%
- 10Y*
- 1.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWJJX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FGBCX's 1.53% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWJJX vs. FGBCX — Risk / Return Rank
NWJJX
FGBCX
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWJJX | FGBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.71 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.04 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.21 | +0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 3.39 | +0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWJJX | FGBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.71 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.14 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.24 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWJJX and FGBCX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Dividend Comparison
NWJJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than FGBCX's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.10% | 3.09% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 5.17% | 3.30% | 2.60% | 2.16% | 3.12% | 2.42% |
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C | 2.60% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.27% | 1.10% | 0.47% | 3.73% | 1.69% | 1.76% | 0.99% | 1.54% | 1.64% |
Drawdowns
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWJJX drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, roughly equal to the maximum FGBCX drawdown of -19.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWJJX and FGBCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWJJX | FGBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -19.98% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.83% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | -19.42% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.99% | -19.98% | +0.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -7.34% | +3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -5.26% | +1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 1.02% | -0.02% |
Volatility
NWJJX vs. FGBCX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) have volatilities of 1.54% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWJJX | FGBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.48% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 2.51% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.30% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 5.91% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 4.94% | -0.10% |