GRISX vs. LOMAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

GRISX (Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund) and LOMAX (Edgar Lomax Value Fund) are both mutual funds - GRISX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while LOMAX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Edgar Lomax. Over the past 10 years, GRISX returned 15.19%/yr vs 10.66%/yr for LOMAX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRISX charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOMAX.

Performance

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRISX having a 10.00% return and LOMAX slightly higher at 10.12%. Over the past 10 years, GRISX has outperformed LOMAX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while LOMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.

GRISX

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 10.00%
• 6M: 9.47%
• 1Y: 26.76%
• 3Y*: 20.31%
• 5Y*: 13.56%
• 10Y*: 15.19%

LOMAX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 10.12%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 24.39%
• 3Y*: 15.39%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRISX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund	10.00%	17.41%	24.13%	25.55%	-18.49%	28.32%	17.92%	30.94%	-3.84%	21.35%
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	10.12%	18.09%	10.29%	5.19%	-0.46%	25.80%	-5.77%	23.27%	-3.31%	19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GRISX and LOMAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between GRISX and LOMAX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

GRISX vs. LOMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRISX

GRISX Risk / Return Rank: 64
GRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
GRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
GRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
GRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
GRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

LOMAX

LOMAX Risk / Return Rank: 84
LOMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
LOMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
LOMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
LOMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LOMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRISX	LOMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.50	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.67	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.97	5.13	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.43	16.79	-3.37

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the LOMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRISX and LOMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRISX drawdown since its inception was -55.53%, roughly equal to the maximum LOMAX drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRISX and LOMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRISX	LOMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.53%	-57.82%	+2.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-4.86%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.78%	-11.93%	-6.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.75%	-17.50%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.85%	-37.81%	+3.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.38%	-2.80%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.84%	-9.39%	-1.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.48%	+0.50%

Volatility

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) at 3.33%. This indicates that GRISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRISX	LOMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	3.33%	+1.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	7.18%	+2.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.49%	9.95%	+2.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	13.24%	+3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.12%	16.52%	+1.60%

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRISX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than LOMAX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRISX vs. LOMAX - Dividend Comparison

GRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than LOMAX's 5.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRISX Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund	4.66%	5.08%	2.62%	0.79%	1.67%	4.96%	1.27%	6.26%	18.54%	6.66%	7.42%	11.98%
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	5.75%	6.34%	6.27%	4.66%	7.73%	5.11%	12.52%	2.16%	15.97%	8.80%	2.68%	15.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRISX and LOMAX in my portfolio?

GRISX and LOMAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRISX or LOMAX?

GRISX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to LOMAX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRISX dropped -55.53% vs LOMAX's -57.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.