NWJJX vs. NWHVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX).
NWJJX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Feb 15, 1984. NWHVX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Jan 4, 1999.
Performance
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | -0.39% | 6.71% | 1.86% | 5.28% | -13.82% | -1.55% | 8.26% | 9.58% | -0.67% | 3.14% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -9.25% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWJJX achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, NWJJX has underperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.39% annualized return.
NWJJX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
NWHVX
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- YTD
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -12.74%
- 1Y
- -9.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWJJX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWJJX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank
NWJJX
NWHVX
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWJJX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | -0.52 | +1.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | -0.66 | +1.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.92 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.51 | +1.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | -1.46 | +5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWJJX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | -0.52 | +1.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.04 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.43 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWJJX and NWHVX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison
NWJJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than NWHVX's 8.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.10% | 3.09% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 5.17% | 3.30% | 2.60% | 2.16% | 3.12% | 2.42% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.77% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Drawdowns
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWJJX drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, smaller than the maximum NWHVX drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWJJX and NWHVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWJJX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -37.12% | +18.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -17.82% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | -37.12% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.99% | -37.12% | +18.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -17.86% | +14.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -7.74% | +3.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 6.21% | -5.21% |
Volatility
NWJJX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) is 1.54%, while Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that NWJJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWJJX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 5.44% | -3.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 11.19% | -8.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 18.29% | -13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 19.88% | -14.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 19.65% | -14.81% |