PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GRISX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GRISX and FCNTX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

GRISX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
7.92%
8.62%
GRISX
FCNTX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GRISX:

1.65

FCNTX:

1.48

Sortino Ratio

GRISX:

2.23

FCNTX:

2.01

Omega Ratio

GRISX:

1.30

FCNTX:

1.27

Calmar Ratio

GRISX:

2.50

FCNTX:

2.18

Martin Ratio

GRISX:

9.18

FCNTX:

7.59

Ulcer Index

GRISX:

2.31%

FCNTX:

3.13%

Daily Std Dev

GRISX:

12.90%

FCNTX:

16.08%

Max Drawdown

GRISX:

-56.20%

FCNTX:

-48.74%

Current Drawdown

GRISX:

-0.67%

FCNTX:

-1.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRISX achieves a 4.54% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 6.70% return. Over the past 10 years, GRISX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 7.92%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.84% annualized return.


GRISX

YTD

4.54%

1M

2.53%

6M

7.92%

1Y

22.48%

5Y*

12.87%

10Y*

7.92%

FCNTX

YTD

6.70%

1M

3.74%

6M

8.63%

1Y

25.51%

5Y*

15.94%

10Y*

13.84%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GRISX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRISX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for GRISX: current value at 0.44% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.44%
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GRISX vs. FCNTX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRISX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GRISX is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GRISX is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GRISX is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GRISX is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GRISX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GRISX is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FCNTX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCNTX is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCNTX is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GRISX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GRISX, currently valued at 1.65, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.651.48
The chart of Sortino ratio for GRISX, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.232.01
The chart of Omega ratio for GRISX, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.301.27
The chart of Calmar ratio for GRISX, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.502.18
The chart of Martin ratio for GRISX, currently valued at 9.18, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.009.187.59
GRISX
FCNTX

The current GRISX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRISX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.65
1.48
GRISX
FCNTX

Dividends

GRISX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

GRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, more than FCNTX's 0.06% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GRISX
Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund
0.88%0.92%1.11%1.24%0.83%1.27%1.89%2.21%1.50%1.71%2.16%1.57%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
0.06%0.08%0.48%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%5.54%0.30%0.31%7.55%

Drawdowns

GRISX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRISX drawdown since its inception was -56.20%, which is greater than FCNTX's maximum drawdown of -48.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRISX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.67%
-1.00%
GRISX
FCNTX

Volatility

GRISX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide S&P 500 Index Fund (GRISX) is 3.09%, while Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that GRISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.09%
4.25%
GRISX
FCNTX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab