NWHFX vs. PRVIX
NWHFX (Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund) and PRVIX (T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NWHFX returned 10.98%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for PRVIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NWHFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PRVIX.
Performance
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NWHFX having a 20.72% return and PRVIX slightly lower at 20.22%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NWHFX having a 10.98% annualized return and PRVIX not far ahead at 11.27%.
NWHFX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 6M
- 18.76%
- 1Y
- 37.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.98%
PRVIX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 18.27%
- 1Y
- 34.61%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 20.72% | 9.95% | 10.23% | 15.78% | -12.91% | 36.15% | 8.82% | 21.18% | -16.17% | 4.04% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 20.22% | 8.44% | 10.96% | 12.46% | -18.42% | 25.60% | 12.58% | 25.95% | -11.49% | 12.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHFX and PRVIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2015 | 0.95 |
The correlation between NWHFX and PRVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHFX vs. PRVIX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHFX
PRVIX
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWHFX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 4.19 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.49 | 15.68 | +0.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than PRVIX's maximum drawdown of -40.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and PRVIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHFX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.51% | -40.95% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.50% | -8.93% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.68% | -24.57% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.68% | -28.00% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.51% | -40.95% | -6.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | 0.00% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.32% | -8.29% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.37% | +0.05% |
Volatility
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) is 4.72%, while T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I (PRVIX) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that NWHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHFX | PRVIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 5.18% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.80% | 12.49% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 17.16% | -0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 19.88% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 21.10% | +1.71% |
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PRVIX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHFX vs. PRVIX - Dividend Comparison
NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, less than PRVIX's 10.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund | 9.59% | 11.48% | 13.85% | 1.38% | 3.31% | 4.98% | 0.83% | 0.65% | 15.39% | 11.63% | 0.62% | 1.21% |
PRVIX T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund Class I | 10.08% | 12.11% | 9.96% | 3.40% | 5.54% | 7.15% | 2.12% | 4.72% | 9.61% | 3.79% | 3.88% | 22.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, NWHFX and PRVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PRVIX has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to NWHFX (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs PRVIX's -40.95%.
NWHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHFX and PRVIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer