NWHVX vs. GMRAX
NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) and GMRAX (Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while GMRAX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX returned 8.96%/yr vs 11.30%/yr for GMRAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWHVX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for GMRAX.
Performance
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWHVX achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly lower than GMRAX's 21.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHVX has underperformed GMRAX with an annualized return of 8.96%, while GMRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.
NWHVX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- -9.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
GMRAX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 21.36%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.23% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
GMRAX Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund | 21.36% | 12.26% | 9.12% | 17.56% | -20.82% | 14.27% | 19.59% | 24.87% | -10.71% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWHVX and GMRAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between NWHVX and GMRAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWHVX vs. GMRAX — Risk / Return Rank
NWHVX
GMRAX
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) and Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWHVX | GMRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.36 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 3.96 | -4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 13.97 | -14.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWHVX drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum GMRAX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHVX and GMRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWHVX | GMRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.12% | -59.36% | +22.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.82% | -11.06% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.80% | -27.67% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.12% | -32.00% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.12% | -41.78% | +4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.22% | 0.00% | -14.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -12.57% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.29% | 3.13% | +5.16% |
Volatility
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) is 4.74%, while Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that NWHVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWHVX | GMRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 6.45% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 14.34% | -2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.84% | 19.77% | -4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.93% | 22.72% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.71% | 23.60% | -3.89% |
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWHVX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GMRAX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWHVX vs. GMRAX - Dividend Comparison
NWHVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.40%, more than GMRAX's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMRAX Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund | 2.07% | 2.45% | 4.99% | 0.52% | 1.51% | 6.81% | 0.56% | 7.38% | 46.93% | 17.82% | 7.14% | 12.55% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.40% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWHVX and GMRAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMRAX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to NWHVX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHVX dropped -37.12% vs GMRAX's -59.36%.
GMRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWHVX and GMRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer