GMRAX vs. NWHVX
GMRAX (Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund) and NWHVX (Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - GMRAX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Nationwide, while NWHVX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Nationwide. Over the past 10 years, GMRAX returned 11.30%/yr vs 8.96%/yr for NWHVX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GMRAX charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for NWHVX.
Performance
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GMRAX achieves a 21.36% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GMRAX has outperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 11.30%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
GMRAX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 21.36%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 41.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.30%
NWHVX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -6.54%
- 1Y
- -9.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMRAX Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund | 21.36% | 12.26% | 9.12% | 17.56% | -20.82% | 14.27% | 19.59% | 24.87% | -10.71% | 14.21% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | -5.23% | -2.38% | 9.89% | 23.84% | -28.32% | 25.03% | 31.17% | 29.96% | -2.97% | 23.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between GMRAX and NWHVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between GMRAX and NWHVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GMRAX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank
GMRAX
NWHVX
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GMRAX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.92 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | -0.48 | +4.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.97 | -1.03 | +14.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GMRAX drawdown since its inception was -59.36%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GMRAX and NWHVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GMRAX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.36% | -37.12% | -22.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.06% | -17.82% | +6.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.67% | -19.80% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.00% | -37.12% | +5.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.78% | -37.12% | -4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -14.22% | +14.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.57% | -7.85% | -4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 8.29% | -5.16% |
Volatility
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund (GMRAX) has a higher volatility of 6.45% compared to Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) at 4.74%. This indicates that GMRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GMRAX | NWHVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.45% | 4.74% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.34% | 11.79% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.77% | 14.84% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 19.93% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.60% | 19.71% | +3.89% |
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GMRAX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GMRAX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison
GMRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than NWHVX's 8.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMRAX Nationwide Small Cap Index Fund | 2.07% | 2.45% | 4.99% | 0.52% | 1.51% | 6.81% | 0.56% | 7.38% | 46.93% | 17.82% | 7.14% | 12.55% |
NWHVX Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund | 8.40% | 7.96% | 11.93% | 16.14% | 36.45% | 34.64% | 6.16% | 18.85% | 38.53% | 11.37% | 8.97% | 13.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GMRAX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GMRAX has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to NWHVX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GMRAX dropped -59.36% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.
GMRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GMRAX and NWHVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer