PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWHFX vs. AVALX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHFX achieves a 18.47% return, which is significantly lower than AVALX's 21.92% return. Over the past 10 years, NWHFX has underperformed AVALX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while AVALX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.56% annualized return.


NWHFX

1D
0.90%
1M
3.29%
YTD
18.47%
6M
18.23%
1Y
37.16%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.65%

AVALX

1D
1.28%
1M
1.25%
YTD
21.92%
6M
24.36%
1Y
58.85%
3Y*
34.33%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
20.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
18.47%9.95%10.23%15.78%-12.91%36.15%8.82%21.18%-16.17%4.04%
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
21.92%67.06%8.29%13.11%10.50%37.67%18.89%25.67%-16.95%17.37%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and AVALX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2013

0.59

The correlation between NWHFX and AVALX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. AVALX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHFX
NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AVALX
AVALX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVALX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVALX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Aegis Value Fund (AVALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NWHFXAVALXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.62

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.60

7.34

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.12

25.89

-9.76

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is lower than the AVALX Sharpe Ratio of 3.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and AVALX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWHFXAVALXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.66

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.99

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.93

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.54

-0.09

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, smaller than the maximum AVALX drawdown of -73.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and AVALX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWHFXAVALXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.51%

-73.72%

+26.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-8.32%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.68%

-13.59%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.68%

-32.00%

+7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.51%

-48.34%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.64%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-10.95%

+3.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.35%

+0.07%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Volatility Comparison

Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Aegis Value Fund (AVALX) at 3.09%. This indicates that NWHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWHFXAVALXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.09%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

12.61%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.64%

16.77%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.56%

22.22%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

22.17%

+0.62%

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than AVALX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWHFX vs. AVALX - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than AVALX's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVALX
Aegis Value Fund
1.92%2.34%7.07%2.23%0.16%0.00%6.62%2.36%6.18%0.00%1.45%0.04%
NWHFX
Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund
9.78%11.48%13.85%1.38%3.31%4.98%0.83%0.65%15.39%11.63%0.62%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWHFX and AVALX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to AVALX (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs AVALX's -73.72%.

AVALX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.66 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWHFX and AVALX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer