NWG vs. MGC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NWG (NatWest Group plc) is a stock, while MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, NWG returned 14.32%/yr vs 16.36%/yr for MGC. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

NWG vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NatWest Group plc (NWG) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWG achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than MGC's 10.80% return. Over the past 10 years, NWG has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 14.32%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.

NWG

• 1D: -1.98%
• 1M: 4.97%
• YTD: -5.66%
• 6M: -0.96%
• 1Y: 16.03%
• 3Y*: 42.89%
• 5Y*: 29.37%
• 10Y*: 14.32%

MGC

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 10.80%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: 16.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWG vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWG NatWest Group plc	-5.66%	81.29%	92.31%	-4.69%	11.23%	39.24%	-24.92%	29.18%	-26.25%	38.16%
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	10.80%	19.31%	27.16%	29.77%	-19.95%	27.58%	21.57%	31.14%	-3.45%	22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NWG and MGC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007	0.53

The correlation between NWG and MGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWG vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWG

NWG Risk / Return Rank: 54
NWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NWG Omega Ratio Rank: 49
NWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NWG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

MGC

MGC Risk / Return Rank: 69
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWG vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NatWest Group plc (NWG) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWG	MGC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.52	2.42	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	3.30	-2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.43	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.67	3.03	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	13.61	-11.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWG vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWG Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is lower than the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWG and MGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWG	MGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52	2.42	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.86	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.90	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.11	0.60	-0.71

Drawdowns

NWG vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWG drawdown since its inception was -96.96%, which is greater than MGC's maximum drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWG and MGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWG	MGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.96%	-51.93%	-45.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.03%	-9.85%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.62%	-19.28%	-15.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.56%	-25.74%	-14.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.34%	-33.07%	-34.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.59%	-0.79%	-70.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-86.23%	-7.06%	-79.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	2.19%	+7.34%

Volatility

NWG vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

NatWest Group plc (NWG) has a higher volatility of 9.69% compared to Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) at 3.04%. This indicates that NWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWG	MGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.69%	3.04%	+6.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.75%	9.27%	+14.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.20%	12.32%	+18.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.51%	17.27%	+16.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.31%	18.21%	+20.10%

Dividends

NWG vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

NWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.53%, more than MGC's 0.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF	0.87%	0.93%	1.15%	1.35%	1.65%	1.17%	1.45%	1.81%	2.10%	1.83%	2.14%	2.11%
NWG NatWest Group plc	5.53%	3.69%	4.36%	9.42%	11.57%	2.74%	4.59%	9.75%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWG and MGC in my portfolio?

NWG and MGC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWG or MGC?

NWG has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to MGC (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWG dropped -96.96% vs MGC's -51.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.