NVYY vs. CIFG
NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.
Performance
NVYY vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly lower than CIFG's 96.56% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 21.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIFG
- 1D
- -3.87%
- 1M
- 42.24%
- YTD
- 96.56%
- 6M
- 67.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVYY vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 2.32% | -2.98% |
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 96.56% | -32.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and CIFG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. CIFG — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
CIFG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVYY vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVYY | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum CIFG drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and CIFG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -71.71% | +56.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.93% | -10.44% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.05% | -35.54% | +30.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | — | — |
Volatility
NVYY vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | CIFG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.47% | 205.93% | -181.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 205.93% | -182.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.78% | 205.93% | -182.15% |
NVYY vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVYY vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 144.14%, while CIFG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 144.14% | 75.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVYY and CIFG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 144.14%, compared with 0.00% for CIFG.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.75% for CIFG.
Find the right allocation for NVYY and CIFG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer