PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVT vs. LRCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVT vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVT achieves a 61.19% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 89.76% return.


NVT

1D
0.58%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
61.19%
6M
53.45%
1Y
142.75%
3Y*
52.77%
5Y*
40.23%
10Y*

LRCX

1D
6.98%
1M
10.34%
YTD
89.76%
6M
99.61%
1Y
278.49%
3Y*
76.58%
5Y*
40.10%
10Y*
46.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVT vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
NVT
nVent Electric plc
61.19%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%0.18%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
89.76%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%119.33%-27.09%

Correlation

The correlation between NVT and LRCX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2018

0.49

The correlation between NVT and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVT:

$26.86B

LRCX:

$409.71B

EPS

NVT:

$3.00

LRCX:

$5.29

PE Ratio

NVT:

54.65

LRCX:

61.36

PEG Ratio

NVT:

1.32

LRCX:

4.64

PS Ratio

NVT:

6.21

LRCX:

18.98

PB Ratio

NVT:

7.08

LRCX:

38.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVT:

$4.33B

LRCX:

$21.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVT:

$1.60B

LRCX:

$10.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVT:

$857.60M

LRCX:

$6.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVT vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVT vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for nVent Electric plc (NVT) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVTLRCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.60

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.48

14.02

-5.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.48

47.19

-17.71

NVT vs. LRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVT Sharpe Ratio is 3.53, which is lower than the LRCX Sharpe Ratio of 5.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVT and LRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVTLRCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53

5.46

-1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.13

0.87

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.43

+0.36

Drawdowns

NVT vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVT drawdown since its inception was -56.18%, smaller than the maximum LRCX drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVT and LRCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVTLRCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.18%

-87.90%

+31.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.93%

-20.01%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.67%

-47.10%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.67%

-56.39%

+9.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.13%

-5.60%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-28.18%

+16.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.86%

5.93%

-1.07%

Volatility

NVT vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for nVent Electric plc (NVT) is 11.44%, while Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that NVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVTLRCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

18.51%

-7.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.94%

42.13%

-10.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.76%

51.52%

-10.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.96%

46.25%

-10.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.38%

44.76%

-6.38%

Dividends

NVT vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison

NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than LRCX's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.31%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.50%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVT vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between nVent Electric plc and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.24B
5.84B
(NVT) Total Revenue
(LRCX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVT vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between nVent Electric plc and Lam Research Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
35.9%
49.8%
Portfolio components
NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVT and LRCX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRCX has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to NVT (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVT dropped -56.18% vs LRCX's -87.90%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVT and LRCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer