NVOH vs. IMOM
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and IMOM (Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVOH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while IMOM is a Momentum fund tracking the Alpha Architect Intern.Quan. Mome. (USD)(TR). NVOH is actively managed, while IMOM is passively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -21.73% vs 30.21% for IMOM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IMOM.
Performance
NVOH vs. IMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly lower than IMOM's 10.71% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 13.86%
- 6M
- -11.72%
- YTD
- 2.61%
- 1Y
- -21.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IMOM
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- 6M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 30.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.02%
NVOH vs. IMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 2.61% | -43.79% |
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 10.71% | 44.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and IMOM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. IMOM — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
IMOM
NVOH vs. IMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVOH | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 1.89 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.81 | 7.00 | -7.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. IMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than IMOM's maximum drawdown of -45.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and IMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -45.74% | -15.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.22% | -15.61% | -30.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.00% | -8.51% | -37.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.97% | -14.10% | -24.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.64% | 4.20% | +25.44% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. IMOM - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 8.79% compared to Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF (IMOM) at 7.91%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | IMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.79% | 7.91% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.95% | 18.53% | +17.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.31% | 20.98% | +28.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.25% | 20.11% | +28.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.25% | 20.21% | +28.04% |
NVOH vs. IMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IMOM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. IMOM - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than IMOM's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMOM Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF | 2.28% | 2.53% | 4.52% | 2.95% | 6.06% | 1.27% | 0.59% | 1.17% | 0.78% | 1.11% | 0.54% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 6.30% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and IMOM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOH has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to IMOM (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs IMOM's -45.74%.
On 1-year performance, IMOM leads with 30.21% vs -21.73% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IMOM has performed better with a 30.21% return vs -21.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IMOM.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 2.28% for IMOM.
NVOH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IMOM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.38% for IMOM.
IMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and IMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer