NVOH vs. IFLO
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past year, NVOH returned -22.77% vs 32.28% for IFLO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.
Performance
NVOH vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 16.93% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- -22.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFLO
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 16.93%
- 6M
- 16.46%
- 1Y
- 32.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVOH vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -0.97% | -22.01% |
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 16.93% | 13.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and IFLO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
IFLO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVOH vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVOH | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and IFLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -6.44% | -55.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.22% | -6.44% | -39.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.89% | -3.37% | -44.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -1.25% | -37.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | — | — |
Volatility
NVOH vs. IFLO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | IFLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.38% | 14.75% | +34.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.74% | 14.75% | +33.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.74% | 14.75% | +33.99% |
NVOH vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than IFLO's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.51% | 0.73% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 6.53% | 2.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and IFLO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, IFLO leads with 32.28% vs -22.77% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IFLO has performed better with a 32.28% return vs -22.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 1.51% for IFLO.
They also come from different issuers: Precidian and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.56% for IFLO.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and IFLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer