NVIT vs. XRMI

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NVIT (YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and XRMI (Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. NVIT is actively managed, while XRMI is passively managed. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NVIT charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XRMI.

Performance

NVIT vs. XRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than XRMI's 3.64% return.

NVIT

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 4.18%
• 6M: 9.05%
• YTD: 11.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XRMI

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 2.36%
• YTD: 3.64%
• 1Y: 10.84%
• 3Y*: 6.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 2.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF	$409.18K	$321.88K	$299.20K
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	$126.16K	$125.56K	$168.31K

NVIT vs. XRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF	11.45%	3.04%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	3.64%	2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and XRMI is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

NVIT vs. XRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XRMI

XRMI Risk / Return Rank: 71
XRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
XRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
XRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVIT vs. XRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF (XRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVIT	XRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.45	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.34	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.99	—

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. XRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum XRMI drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and XRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVIT	XRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.24%	-15.31%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.99%	-0.23%	-9.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-5.75%	+1.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVIT	XRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.60%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.46%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.42%	5.68%	+23.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.42%	6.87%	+22.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.42%	6.87%	+22.55%

NVIT vs. XRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVIT vs. XRMI - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.25%, more than XRMI's 12.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
NVIT YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF	17.25%	2.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.52%	12.35%	11.86%	12.62%	12.84%	2.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVIT and XRMI in my portfolio?

NVIT and XRMI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVIT or XRMI?

On fees, XRMI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVIT or XRMI?

XRMI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVIT or XRMI?

NVIT has the higher dividend yield at 17.25%, compared with 12.52% for XRMI.

What is the main difference between NVIT and XRMI?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.60% for XRMI.