PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVIT vs. PLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVIT vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIT achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -23.00% return.


NVIT

1D
2.26%
1M
4.18%
6M
9.05%
YTD
11.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PLTY

1D
1.10%
1M
-2.83%
6M
-8.14%
YTD
-23.00%
1Y
-16.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$409.18K$321.88K$299.20K
$4.74M$3.96M$6.06M

NVIT vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVIT and PLTY is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVIT vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PLTY
PLTY Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVIT vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax NVDA Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (NVIT) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVITPLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.83

NVIT vs. PLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVIT vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIT drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, smaller than the maximum PLTY drawdown of -41.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIT and PLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVITPLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.24%

-41.36%

+27.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-33.22%

+23.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-14.41%

+9.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.78%

Volatility

NVIT vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVITPLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.42%

44.02%

-14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.42%

52.23%

-22.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.42%

52.23%

-22.81%

NVIT vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIT has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVIT vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison

NVIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.25%, less than PLTY's 123.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVIT and PLTY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PLTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PLTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for NVIT.

PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 123.19%, compared with 17.25% for NVIT.

Their fees differ too: 1.08% for NVIT and 0.99% for PLTY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVIT and PLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer