PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVII vs. QQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVII vs. QQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVII having a 12.61% return and QQQI slightly higher at 13.11%.


NVII

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
12.61%
6M
13.34%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQI

1D
0.04%
1M
2.00%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.48%
1Y
29.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. QQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVII
REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF
12.61%47.63%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.11%16.15%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and QQQI is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025

0.64

The correlation between NVII and QQQI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVII vs. QQQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. QQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVIIQQQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.38

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

3.10

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

13.29

-6.34

NVII vs. QQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QQQI Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and QQQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVII vs. QQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum QQQI drawdown of -20.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and QQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVIIQQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-20.00%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.47%

-9.61%

-8.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.83%

-0.46%

-10.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.75%

-2.20%

-3.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.68%

2.24%

+5.44%

Volatility

NVII vs. QQQI - Volatility Comparison

REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a higher volatility of 13.92% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) at 7.00%. This indicates that NVII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVIIQQQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.92%

7.00%

+6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.84%

11.66%

+15.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.90%

14.51%

+21.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.41%

17.44%

+17.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.41%

17.44%

+17.97%

NVII vs. QQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQI's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVII vs. QQQI - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.48%, more than QQQI's 14.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NVII
REX NVIDIA Growth & Income ETF
54.48%29.17%0.00%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.54%13.82%12.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVII and QQQI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (13.92%) compared to QQQI (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.47% vs QQQI's -20.00%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 53.28% vs 29.65% for QQQI. On fees, QQQI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 7.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 53.28% return vs 29.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 54.48%, compared with 14.54% for QQQI.

NVII is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: REX and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVII and 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVII and QQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer