NVDX vs. NVDQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDX returned 58.04% vs -66.60% for NVDQ. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -34.17% return.

NVDX

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -8.51%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 11.25%
• 1Y: 58.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDQ

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 1.84%
• YTD: -34.17%
• 6M: -36.34%
• 1Y: -66.60%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	8.64%	26.24%	384.03%	28.06%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-34.17%	-74.63%	-93.80%	-28.84%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDX and NVDQ is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	-1.00

The correlation between NVDX and NVDQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -1.00 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDX vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDX

NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 26
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 1
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDX	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	-0.95	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	-1.63	+3.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.82	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	-0.92	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.91	-1.38	+4.29

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDX and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and NVDQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDX	NVDQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.19%	-99.45%	+31.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.76%	-72.31%	+28.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.33%	-99.33%	+75.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.33%	-88.27%	+67.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.99%	48.54%	-28.55%

Volatility

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) have volatilities of 25.45% and 25.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDX	NVDQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.45%	25.39%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.08%	53.69%	-0.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.57%	70.06%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.43%	95.36%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.43%	95.36%	+0.07%

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDX and NVDQ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

NVDX vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than NVDQ's 0.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.40%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	3.08%	3.35%	15.48%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDX and NVDQ in my portfolio?

NVDX and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDX or NVDQ?

NVDX has higher volatility (25.45%) compared to NVDQ (25.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDX dropped -68.19% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

Which ETF is better, NVDX or NVDQ?

On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 58.04% vs -66.60% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDX or NVDQ?

Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 58.04% return vs -66.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDX or NVDQ?

NVDX and NVDQ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDX or NVDQ?

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.40% for NVDQ.

What is the main difference between NVDX and NVDQ?

NVDX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and T-Rex.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.