PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDW vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDW vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's 0.25% return.


NVDW

1D
2.02%
1M
13.37%
YTD
18.30%
6M
20.44%
1Y
59.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
0.61%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and TLTX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDW vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDWTLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.69

NVDW vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDWTLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

0.70

+0.89

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDWTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-6.35%

-19.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.85%

-3.46%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-2.27%

-5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.51%

Volatility

NVDW vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDWTLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.06%

9.14%

+31.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.11%

9.14%

+31.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.11%

9.14%

+31.97%

NVDW vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDW vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.01%, more than TLTX's 15.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDW and TLTX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 57.01%, compared with 15.70% for TLTX.

NVDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 0.29% for TLTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDW and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer