NVDW vs. TLTX
NVDW (Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while TLTX is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
NVDW vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 18.30% return, which is significantly higher than TLTX's 0.25% return.
NVDW
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 13.37%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 59.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDW vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 18.30% | 7.98% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 0.25% | 5.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDW and TLTX is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDW vs. TLTX — Risk / Return Rank
NVDW
TLTX
NVDW vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 0.70 | +0.89 |
Drawdowns
NVDW vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, which is greater than TLTX's maximum drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.54% | -6.35% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.85% | -3.46% | -5.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.19% | -2.27% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | — | — |
Volatility
NVDW vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDW | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.99% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.06% | 9.14% | +31.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.11% | 9.14% | +31.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.11% | 9.14% | +31.97% |
NVDW vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDW vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 57.01%, more than TLTX's 15.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDW Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF | 57.01% | 38.94% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.70% | 7.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDW and TLTX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLTX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLTX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.
NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 57.01%, compared with 15.70% for TLTX.
NVDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while TLTX is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for NVDW and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer