PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDW vs. MRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDW vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 60.69% return.


NVDW

1D
3.90%
1M
3.43%
6M
3.83%
YTD
6.34%
1Y
13.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.18%

MRNY

1D
-4.13%
1M
-26.21%
6M
15.78%
YTD
60.69%
1Y
60.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-22.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.54M$3.80M$3.20M
$1.52M$1.61M$2.95M

NVDW vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and MRNY is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDW vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNY
MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDW vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDWMRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

1.73

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

5.11

-4.30

NVDW vs. MRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the MRNY Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and MRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and MRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDWMRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-82.15%

+56.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

-28.84%

+3.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.07%

-66.17%

+48.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-53.18%

+43.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.49%

11.47%

+1.02%

Volatility

NVDW vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) is 14.31%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 17.82%. This indicates that NVDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDWMRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.31%

17.82%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

36.53%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.58%

53.56%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.33%

51.54%

-9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

51.54%

-9.21%

NVDW vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDW and MRNY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

NVDW vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 62.58%, less than MRNY's 101.63% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
101.63%145.98%178.49%1.75%
NVDW
Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
62.58%38.94%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDW and MRNY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNY has higher volatility (17.82%) compared to NVDW (14.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs MRNY's -82.15%.

On 1-year performance, MRNY leads with 60.66% vs 13.25% for NVDW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDW has been the lower-risk option at 14.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MRNY has performed better with a 60.66% return vs 13.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDW and MRNY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 101.63%, compared with 62.58% for NVDW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

MRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDW and MRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer