PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDW vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDW vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 14.34% return.


NVDW

1D
-4.20%
1M
9.65%
YTD
15.96%
6M
20.80%
1Y
56.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AAPL

1D
-1.57%
1M
12.18%
YTD
14.34%
6M
9.39%
1Y
53.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
20.38%
10Y*
30.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVDW
Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
15.96%40.00%
AAPL
Apple Inc
14.34%35.07%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and AAPL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDW vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW
NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDWAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.88

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

9.76

-4.32

NVDW vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDWAAPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.40

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

0.44

+1.07

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDWAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.54%

-81.80%

+56.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.54%

-13.80%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.65%

-1.57%

-9.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.19%

-29.61%

+21.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.49%

5.47%

+5.02%

Volatility

NVDW vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) has a higher volatility of 15.04% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.46%. This indicates that NVDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDWAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.04%

5.46%

+9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

15.91%

+14.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.15%

22.32%

+18.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.15%

27.46%

+13.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.15%

28.89%

+12.26%

Dividends

NVDW vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.16%, more than AAPL's 0.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.34%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
NVDW
Roundhill ETF Trust Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF
58.16%38.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDW and AAPL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDW has higher volatility (15.04%) compared to AAPL (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDW and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer