NVDU vs. TMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVDU (Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). NVDU is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDU returned 51.92% vs -2.80% for TMF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.

Performance

NVDU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDU achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -4.67% return.

NVDU

• 1D: -8.71%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: 2.08%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 51.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMF

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: -4.67%
• 6M: -5.95%
• 1Y: -2.80%
• 3Y*: -21.07%
• 5Y*: -31.33%
• 10Y*: -16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	2.08%	33.65%	289.29%	12.08%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	-4.67%	-2.94%	-35.95%	11.06%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDU and TMF is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023	0.01

Return for Risk

NVDU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDU

NVDU Risk / Return Rank: 24
NVDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
NVDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
NVDU Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NVDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
NVDU Martin Ratio Rank: 22

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 8
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDU	TMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	-0.10	+0.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	0.05	+1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.01	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	-0.11	+1.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.70	-0.23	+2.93

NVDU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDU and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDU drawdown since its inception was -67.27%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDU and TMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDU	TMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.27%	-92.89%	+25.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.27%	-26.51%	-15.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-88.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.48%	-92.11%	+61.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.91%	-43.76%	+24.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.30%	12.26%	+7.04%

Volatility

NVDU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF (NVDU) has a higher volatility of 26.33% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 6.50%. This indicates that NVDU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDU	TMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.33%	6.50%	+19.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.28%	19.35%	+33.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.48%	27.91%	+42.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	91.03%	46.59%	+44.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.03%	43.86%	+47.17%

NVDU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

NVDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.68%, more than TMF's 4.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVDU Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X Shares ETF	5.68%	5.68%	16.85%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	4.09%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDU and TMF in my portfolio?

NVDU and TMF have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDU or TMF?

NVDU has higher volatility (26.33%) compared to TMF (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDU dropped -67.27% vs TMF's -92.89%.

Which ETF is better, NVDU or TMF?

On 1-year performance, NVDU leads with 51.92% vs -2.80% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDU or TMF?

Over the 1-year period, NVDU has performed better with a 51.92% return vs -2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDU or TMF?

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for NVDU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDU or TMF?

NVDU has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 4.09% for TMF.

What is the main difference between NVDU and TMF?

NVDU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for NVDU and 1.01% for TMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.