NVDQ vs. SNDU
NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and SNDU (T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while SNDU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the SanDisk Corporation (SNDK). NVDQ is actively managed, while SNDU is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NVDQ charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for SNDU.
Performance
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NVDQ
- 1D
- -3.82%
- 1M
- -23.21%
- YTD
- -38.57%
- 6M
- -41.67%
- 1Y
- -69.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SNDU
- 1D
- -7.62%
- 1M
- 45.92%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -36.53% |
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF | 534.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDQ and SNDU is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDQ vs. SNDU — Risk / Return Rank
NVDQ
SNDU
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) and T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDQ | SNDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDQ | SNDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.89 | 1,667.31 | -1,668.20 |
Drawdowns
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDQ drawdown since its inception was -99.45%, which is greater than SNDU's maximum drawdown of -46.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDQ and SNDU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDQ | SNDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.45% | -46.69% | -52.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -73.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.38% | -7.62% | -91.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.22% | -10.18% | -78.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 48.77% | — | — |
Volatility
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDQ | SNDU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.89% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.77% | 185.46% | -117.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 185.46% | -89.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.47% | 185.46% | -89.99% |
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDQ has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SNDU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDQ vs. SNDU - Dividend Comparison
NVDQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while SNDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 0.42% | 0.26% | 4.59% | 11.60% |
SNDU T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDQ and SNDU have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDQ is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDQ is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for SNDU.
NVDQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.00% for SNDU.
NVDQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while SNDU is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDQ and 1.50% for SNDU.
Find the right allocation for NVDQ and SNDU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer