PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDL vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.


NVDL

1D
-7.15%
1M
14.24%
YTD
19.95%
6M
27.27%
1Y
84.82%
3Y*
109.72%
5Y*
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
19.95%32.57%344.58%432.18%-28.32%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%-1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and FDL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

0.01

The correlation between NVDL and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NVDL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NVDL
FDL

Financial Services

100.0%
15.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.7%

Energy

-

27.3%

Healthcare

-

16.8%

Industrials

-

3.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

6.5%

Financial Services

NVDL
100.0%
FDL
15.1%

Basic Materials

NVDL

-

FDL
0.3%

Communication Services

NVDL

-

FDL
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NVDL

-

FDL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

NVDL

-

FDL
14.7%

Energy

NVDL

-

FDL
27.3%

Healthcare

NVDL

-

FDL
16.8%

Industrials

NVDL

-

FDL
3.8%

Real Estate

NVDL

-

FDL

-

Technology

NVDL

-

FDL
1.1%

Utilities

NVDL

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDL
NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDLFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.37

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

5.56

-3.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

13.56

-8.93

NVDL vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDL and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDLFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.11

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.77

0.45

+1.32

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDLFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.55%

-65.93%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.23%

-4.27%

-37.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.55%

-12.24%

-55.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.19%

-2.18%

-16.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-9.66%

-7.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.39%

1.75%

+16.64%

Volatility

NVDL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a higher volatility of 24.77% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that NVDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDLFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.77%

2.85%

+21.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.80%

7.87%

+42.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.20%

11.28%

+56.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.43%

14.31%

+76.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.43%

17.11%

+73.32%

NVDL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
NVDL
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%11.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDL and FDL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDL has higher volatility (24.77%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 109.72% vs 18.97% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 109.72% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.

NVDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDL and 0.45% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDL and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer