NVDL vs. FDL
NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. NVDL is actively managed, while FDL is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDL returned 109.72%/yr vs 18.97%/yr for FDL. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FDL.
Performance
NVDL vs. FDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.95% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return.
NVDL
- 1D
- -7.15%
- 1M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 27.27%
- 1Y
- 84.82%
- 3Y*
- 109.72%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDL
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 23.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.97%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.24%
NVDL vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 19.95% | 32.57% | 344.58% | 432.18% | -28.32% |
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 13.33% | 14.79% | 17.98% | 2.94% | -1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDL and FDL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022 | 0.01 |
The correlation between NVDL and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NVDL vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVDL
FDL
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
NVDL
FDL
Basic Materials
NVDL
-
FDL
Communication Services
NVDL
-
FDL
Consumer Cyclical
NVDL
-
FDL
Consumer Defensive
NVDL
-
FDL
Energy
NVDL
-
FDL
Healthcare
NVDL
-
FDL
Industrials
NVDL
-
FDL
Real Estate
NVDL
-
FDL
-
Technology
NVDL
-
FDL
Utilities
NVDL
-
FDL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDL vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank
NVDL
FDL
NVDL vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 5.56 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 13.56 | -8.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.11 | -0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.77 | 0.45 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
NVDL vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, roughly equal to the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and FDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -65.93% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.23% | -4.27% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -67.55% | -12.24% | -55.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.19% | -2.18% | -16.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -9.66% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.39% | 1.75% | +16.64% |
Volatility
NVDL vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a higher volatility of 24.77% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that NVDL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDL | FDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.77% | 2.85% | +21.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.80% | 7.87% | +42.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.20% | 11.28% | +56.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.43% | 14.31% | +76.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.43% | 17.11% | +73.32% |
NVDL vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDL vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison
NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund | 3.68% | 4.04% | 4.96% | 4.58% | 3.58% | 4.59% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 3.97% | 3.18% | 2.93% | 3.65% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDL and FDL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDL has higher volatility (24.77%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs FDL's -65.93%.
On 3-year performance, NVDL leads with 109.72% vs 18.97% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 109.72% return vs 18.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDL.
FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
NVDL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDL and 0.45% for FDL.
FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDL and FDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer