NVDG.F vs. SCHG
NVDG.F (NVIDIA Corporation CDR) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 3 years, NVDG.F returned 63.96%/yr vs 19.86%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
NVDG.F is traded in EUR, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDG.F achieves a 14.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.16% return.
NVDG.F
- 1D
- -2.85%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- 14.79%
- 6M
- 18.45%
- 1Y
- 50.93%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 4.48%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.12%
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 14.79% | 19.94% | 175.23% | 228.92% | -38.65% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.16% | 3.56% | 43.86% | 45.60% | -17.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDG.F and SCHG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDG.F vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
NVDG.F
SCHG
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDG.F | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 1.21 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.70 | 3.49 | +1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDG.F drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG.F and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDG.F | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.32% | -31.88% | -28.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.33% | -15.64% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.10% | -28.18% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.45% | -4.79% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.45% | -5.23% | -11.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.40% | 5.44% | +3.96% |
Volatility
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) has a higher volatility of 12.58% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.39%. This indicates that NVDG.F's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDG.F | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.58% | 4.39% | +8.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.68% | 11.58% | +17.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.21% | 16.05% | +27.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 22.01% | +39.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.93% | 21.88% | +40.05% |
Dividends
NVDG.F vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
NVDG.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR | 0.11% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDG.F and SCHG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NVDG.F and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer