NVDD vs. TMF
NVDD (Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). NVDD is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. Over the past year, NVDD returned -20.12% vs -17.67% for TMF. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 1.01% expense ratio.
Performance
NVDD vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDD achieves a -13.43% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -15.88% return.
NVDD
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- 6M
- -13.93%
- YTD
- -13.43%
- 1Y
- -20.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -48.64%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- -15.88%
- 1Y
- -17.67%
- 3Y*
- -18.84%
- 5Y*
- -35.05%
- 10Y*
- -18.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.44M | $5.40M | $4.86M | |
| $168.22M | $133.63M | $127.70M |
NVDD vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDD Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X Shares | -13.43% | -38.72% | -69.77% | -8.97% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -15.88% | -2.94% | -35.95% | 11.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDD and TMF is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDD vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
NVDD
TMF
NVDD vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X Shares (NVDD) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.91 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | -0.62 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | -1.25 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDD vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDD drawdown since its inception was -88.34%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -93.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDD and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.34% | -93.10% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.63% | -28.69% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -93.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.96% | -93.04% | +6.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -44.08% | -23.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.10% | 14.21% | +0.89% |
Volatility
NVDD vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X Shares (NVDD) has a higher volatility of 12.08% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.36%. This indicates that NVDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.08% | 7.36% | +4.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.46% | 19.96% | +8.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.47% | 27.08% | +9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.06% | 46.37% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.06% | 43.71% | +3.35% |
NVDD vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVDD and TMF have an expense ratio of 1.01%.
Dividends
NVDD vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
NVDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than TMF's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDD Direxion Daily NVDA Bear 1X Shares | 3.77% | 4.19% | 4.83% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.69% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDD and TMF have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDD has higher volatility (12.08%) compared to TMF (7.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDD dropped -88.34% vs TMF's -93.10%.
On 1-year performance, TMF leads with -17.67% vs -20.12% for NVDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.01% expense ratio. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TMF has performed better with a -17.67% return vs -20.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDD and TMF have the same expense ratio: 1.01% per year.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 3.77% for NVDD.
NVDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds.
NVDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.55 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDD and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer