NVDB vs. XDSQ
NVDB (ProShares Ultra NVDA) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVDB is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.52% return.
NVDB
- 1D
- -11.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 8.52% | 2.15% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.52% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDB and XDSQ is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDB vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
NVDB
XDSQ
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.69 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -26.06% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.33% | -0.30% | -25.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.84% | -4.96% | -13.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDB | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 74.10% | 10.55% | +63.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.10% | 15.27% | +58.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.10% | 15.09% | +59.01% |
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDB vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 1.00% | 0.55% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDB and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NVDB.
NVDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NVDB and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for NVDB and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer