PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDA vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed VUG with an annualized return of 67.95%, while VUG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.90% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

VUG

1D
0.18%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
4.99%
6M
5.66%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
23.38%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
4.99%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and VUG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004

0.65

The correlation between NVDA and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDAVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

1.29

+0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

4.43

+0.52

NVDA vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, which is greater than VUG's maximum drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-50.68%

-39.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-16.53%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-22.85%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-35.61%

-30.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-35.61%

-30.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-5.56%

-7.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-7.09%

-29.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

4.79%

+3.67%

Volatility

NVDA vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a higher volatility of 13.26% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.73%. This indicates that NVDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

5.73%

+7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

13.00%

+13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

16.46%

+18.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

22.30%

+29.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

21.48%

+28.36%

Dividends

NVDA vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than VUG's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and VUG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.26%) compared to VUG (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs VUG's -50.68%.

VUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer