NVDA vs. KULR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — NVDA in Semiconductors, KULR in Electronic Components. Over the past 5 years, NVDA returned 64.54%/yr vs -29.09%/yr for KULR. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

NVDA vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.

NVDA

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 12.01%
• 6M: 12.58%
• 1Y: 47.43%
• 3Y*: 75.35%
• 5Y*: 64.54%
• 10Y*: 68.47%

KULR

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: 29.07%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: -3.62%
• 1Y: -60.49%
• 3Y*: -11.82%
• 5Y*: -29.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	12.01%	38.92%	171.25%	239.02%	-50.26%	125.48%	122.30%	76.94%	-46.88%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	26.01%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	73.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and KULR is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap NVDA : $5.09T KULR : $148.18M
EPS NVDA : $6.53 KULR : -$1.57
PS Ratio NVDA : 20.13 KULR : 9.11
PB Ratio NVDA : 26.03 KULR : 1.22
Total Revenue (TTM) NVDA : $253.49B KULR : $16.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) NVDA : $187.95B KULR : $770.97K
EBITDA (TTM) NVDA : $192.76B KULR : -$60.59M

Return for Risk

NVDA vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 73
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 19
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDA	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	-0.57	+1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	-0.52	+2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	0.94	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	-0.76	+3.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.73	-0.99	+6.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDA vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDA	KULR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.37	-0.57	+1.94
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.25	-0.23	+1.49
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	-0.11	+0.73

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDA	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.72%	-97.23%	+7.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.21%	-79.80%	+59.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.88%	-94.74%	+57.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.34%	-96.86%	+30.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.39%	-90.29%	+78.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.20%	-66.23%	+30.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.30%	60.84%	-52.54%

Volatility

NVDA vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.14%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDA	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.14%	47.09%	-33.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.37%	76.46%	-50.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.81%	106.05%	-71.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.75%	126.05%	-74.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.85%	126.51%	-76.66%

Dividends

NVDA vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.14%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDA and KULR in my portfolio?

NVDA and KULR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDA or KULR?

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to NVDA (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs KULR's -97.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.