NVD vs. TSLR
NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -68.07% vs 14.39% for TSLR. At a correlation of -0.34, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
NVD vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -37.20% return, which is significantly lower than TSLR's -22.05% return.
NVD
- 1D
- -3.65%
- 1M
- -22.72%
- YTD
- -37.20%
- 6M
- -40.09%
- 1Y
- -68.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- 12.84%
- YTD
- -22.05%
- 6M
- -25.02%
- 1Y
- 14.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVD vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | -37.20% | -73.27% | -93.09% | -15.28% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -22.05% | -25.97% | 67.57% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVD and TSLR is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | -0.34 |
NVD vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NVD
TSLR
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
NVD
TSLR
-
Basic Materials
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Communication Services
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Consumer Cyclical
NVD
-
TSLR
Consumer Defensive
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Energy
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Financial Services
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Healthcare
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Industrials
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Real Estate
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Utilities
NVD
-
TSLR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVD vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
NVD
TSLR
NVD vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVD | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.11 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | 0.27 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | 0.56 | -1.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVD | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.00 | 0.16 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.88 | -0.01 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
NVD vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than TSLR's maximum drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVD | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.26% | -82.80% | -16.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.64% | -54.37% | -18.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.15% | -60.11% | -39.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -81.68% | -50.26% | -31.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.83% | 26.09% | +21.74% |
Volatility
NVD vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 25.96% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) at 24.51%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVD | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.96% | 24.51% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.11% | 54.70% | -2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.48% | 92.79% | -24.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 115.47% | -22.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 92.55% | 115.47% | -22.92% |
NVD vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVD and TSLR have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
NVD vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.83%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF | 18.83% | 11.83% | 8.68% | 15.78% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVD and TSLR have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVD has higher volatility (25.96%) compared to TSLR (24.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs TSLR's -82.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 14.39% vs -68.07% for NVD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLR has been the lower-risk option at 24.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 14.39% return vs -68.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVD and TSLR have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
NVD has the higher dividend yield at 18.83%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVD and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer