PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVD vs. SH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NVD vs. SH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NVD vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
5.59%-73.27%-93.09%-15.28%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
5.77%-11.35%-13.52%-5.82%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NVD having a 5.59% return and SH slightly higher at 5.77%.


NVD

1D
-11.38%
1M
0.27%
YTD
5.59%
6M
-2.50%
1Y
-75.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SH

1D
-2.82%
1M
5.57%
YTD
5.77%
6M
4.49%
1Y
-11.46%
3Y*
-9.86%
5Y*
-7.57%
10Y*
-11.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NVD vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NVD vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.92

-0.63

-0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.62

-0.79

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.89

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.45

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-0.55

-0.47

NVD vs. SH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the SH Sharpe Ratio of -0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and SH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

-0.63

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.85

-0.56

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and SH is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

NVD vs. SH - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.20%, more than SH's 3.92% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
11.20%11.83%8.68%15.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
3.92%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%

Drawdowns

NVD vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -98.85%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and SH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.85%

-94.26%

-4.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-84.54%

-26.61%

-57.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.58%

-93.82%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.48%

-67.49%

-12.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.89%

21.81%

+52.08%

Volatility

NVD vs. SH - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 21.28% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 5.30%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NVDSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.28%

5.30%

+15.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.32%

9.43%

+42.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

82.56%

18.17%

+64.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.63%

16.87%

+76.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.63%

17.99%

+75.64%