NVD vs. BAR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

NVD (GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF) and BAR (GraniteShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - NVD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while BAR is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). NVD is actively managed, while BAR is passively managed. Over the past year, NVD returned -49.89% vs 18.66% for BAR. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. NVD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for BAR.

Performance

NVD vs. BAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVD achieves a -33.57% return, which is significantly lower than BAR's -7.81% return.

NVD

• 1D: 4.40%
• 1M: -2.86%
• 6M: -33.00%
• YTD: -33.57%
• 1Y: -49.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAR

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: -8.18%
• 6M: -13.67%
• YTD: -7.81%
• 1Y: 18.66%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVD vs. BAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	-33.57%	-73.27%	-93.09%	-15.28%
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	-7.81%	64.12%	26.97%	8.80%

Correlation

The correlation between NVD and BAR is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023	-0.05

Return for Risk

NVD vs. BAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVD

NVD Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BAR

BAR Risk / Return Rank: 22
BAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BAR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BAR Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVD vs. BAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) and GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVD	BAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.70	0.67	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	1.01	-1.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.15	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	0.71	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	1.70	-3.23

NVD vs. BAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVD Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the BAR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVD and BAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVD vs. BAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVD drawdown since its inception was -99.26%, which is greater than BAR's maximum drawdown of -26.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVD and BAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVD	BAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.26%	-26.32%	-72.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.41%	-26.32%	-34.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.32%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.11%	-26.32%	-72.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.23%	-6.66%	-75.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.69%	11.02%	+21.67%

Volatility

NVD vs. BAR - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) has a higher volatility of 22.59% compared to GraniteShares Gold Trust (BAR) at 6.48%. This indicates that NVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVD	BAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.59%	6.48%	+16.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.39%	24.03%	+32.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	71.85%	27.79%	+44.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.20%	18.30%	+73.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	92.20%	16.59%	+75.61%

NVD vs. BAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BAR's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVD vs. BAR - Dividend Comparison

NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, while BAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAR GraniteShares Gold Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVD GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF	17.80%	11.83%	8.68%	15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVD and BAR in my portfolio?

NVD and BAR have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVD or BAR?

NVD has higher volatility (22.59%) compared to BAR (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVD dropped -99.26% vs BAR's -26.32%.

Which ETF is better, NVD or BAR?

On 1-year performance, BAR leads with 18.66% vs -49.89% for NVD. On fees, BAR is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, BAR has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVD or BAR?

Over the 1-year period, BAR has performed better with a 18.66% return vs -49.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVD or BAR?

BAR is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVD or BAR?

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.80%, compared with 0.00% for BAR.

What is the main difference between NVD and BAR?

NVD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while BAR is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NVD and 0.17% for BAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.