NVBW vs. CTIF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NVBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF) and CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVBW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while CTIF is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Castellan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVBW returned 11.12% vs 14.52% for CTIF. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NVBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CTIF.

Performance

NVBW vs. CTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBW achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than CTIF's 10.45% return.

NVBW

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.18%
• 6M: 5.23%
• YTD: 6.40%
• 1Y: 11.12%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.08%

CTIF

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 5.15%
• 6M: 7.21%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 14.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	$144.86K	$160.90K	$259.16K
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	$98.33K	$62.36K	$122.18K

NVBW vs. CTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	6.40%	5.70%
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	10.45%	3.87%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBW and CTIF is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.69

The correlation between NVBW and CTIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBW vs. CTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVBW

NVBW Risk / Return Rank: 83
NVBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
NVBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
NVBW Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NVBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
NVBW Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CTIF

CTIF Risk / Return Rank: 42
CTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
CTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
CTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
CTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
CTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVBW vs. CTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVBW	CTIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	1.15	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	1.69	+1.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.20	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	1.55	+1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.69	5.63	+8.06

NVBW vs. CTIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the CTIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBW and CTIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVBW vs. CTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBW drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum CTIF drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBW and CTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBW	CTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-9.43%	+1.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-9.43%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.73%	-1.75%	+1.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	2.59%	-1.78%

Volatility

NVBW vs. CTIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) is 1.54%, while Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) has a volatility of 3.91%. This indicates that NVBW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBW	CTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.54%	3.91%	-2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.46%	9.80%	-5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.28%	12.71%	-7.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	12.63%	-5.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.88%	12.63%	-5.75%

NVBW vs. CTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVBW vs. CTIF - Dividend Comparison

NVBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%.

Position	TTM	2025
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF	4.70%	2.55%
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBW and CTIF in my portfolio?

NVBW and CTIF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVBW or CTIF?

CTIF has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to NVBW (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBW dropped -8.41% vs CTIF's -9.43%.

Which ETF is better, NVBW or CTIF?

On 1-year performance, CTIF leads with 14.52% vs 11.12% for NVBW. On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, NVBW has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBW or CTIF?

Over the 1-year period, CTIF has performed better with a 14.52% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBW or CTIF?

CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NVBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBW or CTIF?

CTIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 0.00% for NVBW.

What is the main difference between NVBW and CTIF?

NVBW is categorized as Options Trading, while CTIF is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Castellan. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NVBW and 0.45% for CTIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.