CTIF vs. MRNY
CTIF (Castellan Targeted Income ETF) and MRNY (YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CTIF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MRNY.
Performance
CTIF vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 5.30% return, which is significantly lower than MRNY's 43.37% return.
CTIF
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 5.30%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRNY
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 43.37%
- 6M
- 59.24%
- 1Y
- 42.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTIF vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 5.30% | 4.75% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 43.37% | -3.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTIF and MRNY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTIF vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank
CTIF
MRNY
CTIF vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CTIF | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | -0.53 | +1.42 |
Drawdowns
CTIF vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and MRNY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTIF | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -82.15% | +72.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -69.82% | +69.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -52.59% | +50.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.14% | — |
Volatility
CTIF vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTIF | MRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 37.22% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.42% | 49.07% | -36.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 50.67% | -38.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.42% | 50.67% | -38.25% |
CTIF vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CTIF vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison
CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than MRNY's 105.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CTIF Castellan Targeted Income ETF | 3.65% | 2.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MRNY YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | 105.80% | 145.98% | 178.49% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTIF and MRNY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CTIF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CTIF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MRNY.
MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 105.80%, compared with 3.65% for CTIF.
They also come from different issuers: Castellan and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.99% for MRNY.
Find the right allocation for CTIF and MRNY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer