NVBW vs. XAPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF) and XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVBW returned 11.16% vs 7.78% for XAPR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for XAPR.

Performance

NVBW vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBW achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 2.92% return.

NVBW

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 4.23%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 8.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAPR

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 2.92%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 7.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBW vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	4.52%	9.25%	6.72%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	2.92%	12.57%	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBW and XAPR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.78

The correlation between NVBW and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBW vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBW

NVBW Risk / Return Rank: 76
NVBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NVBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NVBW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
NVBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
NVBW Martin Ratio Rank: 79

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 95
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBW vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVBW	XAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.28	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	5.06	-1.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.79	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	6.13	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.92	42.73	-28.81

NVBW vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBW and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVBW vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBW drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBW and XAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBW	XAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-6.18%	-2.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-1.27%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.66%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-0.18%	-0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.18%	+0.62%

Volatility

NVBW vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) has a higher volatility of 1.69% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 1.53%. This indicates that NVBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBW	XAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	1.53%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.41%	1.95%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.14%	2.39%	+2.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.93%	6.18%	+0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.93%	6.18%	+0.75%

NVBW vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVBW vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVBW nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBW and XAPR in my portfolio?

NVBW and XAPR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVBW or XAPR?

NVBW has higher volatility (1.69%) compared to XAPR (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBW dropped -8.41% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

Which ETF is better, NVBW or XAPR?

On 1-year performance, NVBW leads with 11.16% vs 7.78% for XAPR. On fees, NVBW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBW or XAPR?

Over the 1-year period, NVBW has performed better with a 11.16% return vs 7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBW or XAPR?

NVBW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBW or XAPR?

NVBW and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NVBW and XAPR?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NVBW and 0.85% for XAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.