PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTIF vs. SPIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CTIF vs. SPIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTIF achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly higher than SPIN's 3.96% return.


CTIF

1D
0.88%
1M
4.08%
6M
7.06%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
13.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.28%

SPIN

1D
1.24%
1M
1.15%
6M
2.65%
YTD
3.96%
1Y
14.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$185.99K$160.92K$255.19K
$106.05K$178.20K$136.27K

CTIF vs. SPIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CTIF and SPIN is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.68

The correlation between CTIF and SPIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTIF vs. SPIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CTIF
CTIF Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIN
SPIN Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CTIF vs. SPIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) and State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CTIFSPINDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.20

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

1.32

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.27

5.27

-1.00

CTIF vs. SPIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTIF Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the SPIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTIF and SPIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CTIF vs. SPIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTIF drawdown since its inception was -9.43%, smaller than the maximum SPIN drawdown of -16.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTIF and SPIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CTIFSPINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-16.85%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.81%

+0.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.18%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-2.21%

+0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

2.45%

+0.14%

Volatility

CTIF vs. SPIN - Volatility Comparison

Castellan Targeted Income ETF (CTIF) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF (SPIN) at 3.43%. This indicates that CTIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CTIFSPINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

3.43%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

8.79%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.83%

11.62%

+1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.61%

14.25%

-1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

14.25%

-1.64%

CTIF vs. SPIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CTIF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SPIN's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

CTIF vs. SPIN - Dividend Comparison

CTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, less than SPIN's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CTIF
Castellan Targeted Income ETF
4.75%2.55%0.00%
SPIN
State Street US Equity Premium Income ETF
4.76%8.20%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


CTIF and SPIN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTIF has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SPIN (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTIF dropped -9.43% vs SPIN's -16.85%.

On 1-year performance, SPIN leads with 14.27% vs 13.36% for CTIF. On fees, SPIN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SPIN has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SPIN has performed better with a 14.27% return vs 13.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPIN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CTIF.

SPIN has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.75% for CTIF.

They also come from different issuers: Castellan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for CTIF and 0.25% for SPIN.

SPIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CTIF and SPIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer