NVBW vs. HELO

Last updated Jul 2, 2026

NVBW (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF) and HELO (JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVBW returned 10.60% vs 8.75% for HELO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NVBW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HELO.

Performance

NVBW vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVBW achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 2.02% return.

NVBW

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 5.25%
• 6M: 5.25%
• 1Y: 10.60%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HELO

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: -0.56%
• YTD: 2.02%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 8.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVBW vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	5.25%	9.25%	9.03%	3.24%
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	2.02%	7.82%	18.05%	5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NVBW and HELO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023	0.85

The correlation between NVBW and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVBW vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVBW

NVBW Risk / Return Rank: 77
NVBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NVBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
NVBW Omega Ratio Rank: 85
NVBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
NVBW Martin Ratio Rank: 80

HELO

HELO Risk / Return Rank: 44
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVBW vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVBW	HELO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.38	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	1.95	+1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.27	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.53	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	6.62	+6.52

NVBW vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVBW Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVBW and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVBW vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVBW drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVBW and HELO.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVBW	HELO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.41%	-10.89%	+2.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.03%	-5.76%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.56%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-1.18%	+0.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.81%	1.33%	-0.52%

Volatility

NVBW vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) have volatilities of 1.80% and 1.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVBW	HELO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	1.87%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.44%	5.01%	-0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	6.39%	-1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.91%	7.94%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.91%	7.94%	-1.03%

NVBW vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVBW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVBW vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

NVBW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
HELO JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF	0.64%	0.67%	0.60%	0.19%
NVBW Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Nov ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVBW and HELO in my portfolio?

NVBW and HELO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVBW or HELO?

HELO has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to NVBW (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVBW dropped -8.41% vs HELO's -10.89%.

Which ETF is better, NVBW or HELO?

On 1-year performance, NVBW leads with 10.60% vs 8.75% for HELO. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVBW or HELO?

Over the 1-year period, NVBW has performed better with a 10.60% return vs 8.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVBW or HELO?

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for NVBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVBW or HELO?

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for NVBW.

What is the main difference between NVBW and HELO?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for NVBW and 0.50% for HELO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.